Speaker Events - Saturday, July 25, 2009
France’s Brice Lalonde: Countering Climate Change Needs Joint Action and Vision of Future
Brice Lalonde, Special Ambassador of France for the Climate Change Negotiation, discussed at IPI the current state of play in climate change talks in the lead-up to the UN conference on the subject in Copenhagen in December.
At the time of his talk, on June 25, 2009, Lalonde had just returned from a meeting of the Major Economies Forum in Mexico.
Here are edited excerpts from his presentation. You can download the full transcript here.
The Copenhagen Meeting: It’s a huge task, as you know, because we understand it’s completely reshuffling the world economy. It’s very technical, very complex, and it’s left to negotiators, which is a mistake. So heads of state have to [grab hold] of it, because the negotiators otherwise are going to steal the whole process and make it too complicated.
Goals: We know what the goal should be. Everybody knows, in 2050, we have to reduce by 50 percent globally all our emissions, and we know that for developed countries, it must be 80 percent. The task is 80 percent reduction by 2050 for all developed countries, which would mean a global reduction of 50 percent…It’s not, of course, easy to do, but this is what we have to do….That means that in 2025, for instance, in all countries of the world, emissions have to decline. Everybody sort of agrees with that.
The need for everybody to act: Some countries still believe that they will only act if they are paid to act, which of course is not the way to see things. Everybody has to do something [to counter] climate change, and once everybody does (because everybody’s threatened by climate change), we will see how we can help each other. It’s not a situation where developed countries would be asking other countries to do something. Everybody has to do something, and slowly, this idea has trickled down.
Who’s responsible? That’s one of the problems we have, and coming from Mexico––where we had a Major Economies Forum––it was quite interesting to see [how we may look] for a center to find order from chaos. For instance, one delegation said, for the long-term goal, “Let’s ask the scientists.” So there is that sort of confusion: where politicians don’t know how to handle the scientific data, and, in fact, it’s not up to the scientists to tell people what to do. Rather, it’s the politicians who have the responsibility to say, “Okay, this is what we’re going to do.” And then we have no center in the sense that we don’t have a benevolent, neutral body, which would set a road map for every country and say, “This is what I suggest, I’m neutral.” No, it comes from each country, 190 countries which would give submissions, and we hope that the truth or the real thing will come out from that.
What will the future look like? This brings me to what I think is one of the most difficult problems: we don’t have an image of the future. We don’t have an image of a desirable, low-carbon future. How would it be? What would the day of Mr. Jones in the UK, or somebody in Africa, in 2060 living in a low-carbon society look like? How would we be living? How would we be producing? Nobody knows. This is very important in my view, because in history, all movements, all big steps, were always taken by people who thought that tomorrow would be better than today, and that you could accept some difficulties today because it’s going to be better tomorrow, and they had an image of how it would be tomorrow. We don’t have that.
The European Union: I’m not allowed to talk on behalf of the European Union today, but I mean, we are quite happy because we have made a very strong decision by adopting a climate energy package. Twenty-seven countries, very different, some twice as rich as others, some completely coal dependent, some, I would say, nuclear dependent, and nevertheless, we got it, and we have the solidarity systems, money flowing from rich countries to less rich countries: different systems, which in our view, can be a model.
France: So we try in France to build some sort of an alliance, to bring the voice of Africa and of the small islands into the negotiation and to try to help them, because that’s the main problem which is also going to face us: food security and survival, in countries that are going to become much more arid.
The Global Observatory
Interview with John Prendergast, Co-Founder, Enough Project
Mr. Prendergast discusses the international justice system and the new ground forged by Invisible Children's Kony2012 campaign.
Key Global Events to Watch in May
A list of key upcoming meetings and events with implications for global affairs.
The Global Observatory is a new website by IPI, providing timely analysis on peace and security issues, interviews with leading policymakers, interactive maps, and more.
Recent Events
May 10, 2012
Arbour: What the Rule of Law Means
“In my understanding of the rule of law, fundamentally, what the rule of law means is that it embraces the principle of equality before the law,” Louise Arbour, president of the International Crisis Group (ICG), told an IPI audience on May 10, 2012. Ms. Arbour outlined that this means that no one is above the law and everyone has both equal protection and equal benefit of the law. ![]()
May 03, 2012
Shachtman: Cyber Threats Akin to South Bronx, Not Pearl Harbor
“There’s not a danger of a cyber Pearl Harbor… it’s more like the South Bronx circa 1999, where there’s a danger that it becomes such a tough neighborhood that no one wants to set up shop there and people move out,” Noah Shachtman, editor of the Danger Room blog at Wired magazine and non-resident fellow at the Brookings Institution, told an IPI audience at a panel on cyber security on May 3, 2011.![]()
April 27, 2012
Preventing Conflicts in Africa: The Role of Early Warning and Response Systems
An April 27th roundtable discussion at IPI titled “Preventing Conflicts in Africa: The Role of Early Warning and Response Systems” examined the progress, prospects and challenges of regional and international early warning and response mechanisms to monitor, anticipate, and mitigate potential conflict situations in Africa.![]()










